• DraftKings Sues Payment Processors for Pulling Service

    10 December 2015

    Draftkings sues processors

    The drama just doesn't end for the daily fantasy sports industry. DraftKings has launched a lawsuit in Boston against Vantiv and Optimal, two payment processing companies, over a breach of contract issue after they pulled their services. This pull came after the New York Attorney General filed a cease and desist warning, which DraftKings is currently contesting in court. This comes down to the effects of the UIGEA, and that's an extremely complicated topic for daily fantasy sports companies.

    The Crux of the Issue

    Here's the issue. The part of the UIGEA that affects payment processors is that they can get in trouble for processing deposits for online gambling that happens to be illegal. If daily fantasy sports is found to be illegal in some jurisdiction, and the company processes payments for it anyway, then they can be found in violation of the UIGEA. This is the angle that Optimal and Vantiv are both coming from, and they're really trying to protect themselves from a ridiculous law that's never worked like it was intended.

    The New York Issue

    In the state of New York, chance-based games are illegal to wager on, but skill-based games are. DraftKings contends that, unlike games like Baccarat or slots, daily fantasy sports is a game of skill. This issue is going to be decided in court anytime now, and that will ultimately be what decides this payment processing issue as well. For now, it's really just going to be a matter of time to see how this plays out because a positive decision in New York would stop giving Optimal and Vantiv reason to pull out of the state, which would presumably resolve this lawsuit immediately.

    The Future of Daily Fantasy Sports

    For better or worse, this court decision in New York is probably going to decide the future of daily fantasy sports in one way or another. If they get a positive result, that DFS is a game of skill, then that will pave the way for other states to make the same determination. However, if they get a negative result and the court decides that DFS is a game of chance, then this will likely domino over to other states with a similar set of gambling laws, and that would be a disaster for the industry.

    Related News

    • 15 February 2019

      Evolution Gaming Signs New Jersey Deal With DraftKings

      Any new deal that adds games to what's available in any of the US states that allow online gambling will be important because the market is still pretty fresh. More live dealer games are coming soon from Evolution Gaming as the result of a recent deal that has them partnering up with DraftKings in New Jersey. DraftKings Expands Into Sports Betting DraftKings, generally known for their fantasy sports product in eight countries, launched a sportsbook in New Jersey back in August.

      Read full article
    • 16 November 2015

      New York Supreme Court Lawsuits for DFS Juggernauts

      Daily fantasy sports hasn't been doing so well over the past couple of months. After a scandal broke loose when a DraftKings employee used insider information to pull about $300,000 in winnings from FanDuel, they have been under fire from virtually every direction. After New York Attorney General Eric Sniederman pressed a cease-and-desist order on them, they have struck back with individual lawsuits in the Supreme Court of the state of New York. The Legality of Daily Fantasy Sports

      Read full article
    • 10 November 2015

      Optimal Payments User Info Possibly Compromised From Old Attack

      Forbes has released a big investigative article that goes into a lot of detail about the attacks against Moneybookers (now Skrill) and Neteller that happened between 2009 and 2010. Those hacks were thought to be fairly harmless at first, but it's come to light that millions of individuals had their data stolen in the breach. This includes password hints for Neteller along with telephone numbers, emails, addresses, birth dates and other information for both. Implications of the Attack

      Read full article