Daily fantasy sports have come under fire in New York from their Attorney General, and the biggest names in the business were forced to make a deal with the AG from Illinois after she determined that the events were illegal in that state as well. The Attorney General in Texas, however, is taking his sweet time with coming out with an opinion on the matter.
Why the Delay?
The Attorneys General from multiple states have come out with a clear-cut opinion of why DFS is illegal inside of the boundaries of their state. However, it's a very unclear matter in Texas because of their existing laws on gambling. The bottom line is that it's illegal to place bets on players or sports games in Texas, with the exception that bets made in a private place are allowed. This really causes a problem because they have to decide if playing daily fantasy sports is considered playing in a private place, and this gets down to undetermined parts of law like if your mobile phone or computer is considered a private method of communication.
Attorney General Paxton's Comments
Texas Attorney General Paxton has been the most cautious AG we've seen of the recent bunch. He was asked for an opinion back in November, and he's yet to release it. He's stated that he wants to be fair about the process of finishing the opinion, and he's refusing to comment on that opinion until it's finished. It's reasonable that it's taking him so long because of all of the topics that have to be decided with this ruling due to the state of Texas law on gambling, but that doesn't help the natural impatience that comes along with wanting to know how things are going to go down in Texas.
Where is Daily Fantasy Sports Heading?
If 2015 is going to be known as the year that DFS really exploded, then 2016 is going to be known as the year that its legal future was decided, for better or worse. It's going to be banned in more places and regulated in more places, and once the dust finally settles, hopefully most players will be able to enjoy their games in peace without worrying about their state government changing their mind on the legality of the events.