• California Legislation Hopes Faltering Yet Again

    25 August 2015

    California

    In the United States, each individual state has to regulate online gambling independently of the others because of how the federal government seems like they're never going to get anything through Congress until the states have their own thing going. Because California is such a huge state with such an overwhelming population, when they regulate any part of the industry, it's going to be a big influence on the rest of the nation. However, they have a track record of almost regulating things, and this almost seems to have carried over to this year as well.

    Political Issues

    The main problem with this year's online poker legislation is one of political influence. The biggest thing is a major fight over which companies should be allowed into a regulated scenario and which companies should not. The tribal groups, racetrack groups, land-based card rooms and online poker rooms are all basically fighting over this, and it's created a virtual deadlock. The biggest problem is that the tribal groups want "bad actor" online poker rooms excluded from any regulated marketplace, and they also want racetracks out.

    Bad Actors and Racetracks

    PokerStars is a good example of what the tribes are calling a bad actor. The point is that they operated in the United States in violation of the UIGEA for a few years, and it's this point that's kept them out of New Jersey in the past as well. Even though the Amaya Gaming Group has bought them out and none of the same major movers and shakers are involved, it's the brand that the tribes keep attacking.

    On top of that, the racetracks are insisting that they get in on any online gambling legislation at all. Their revenues have been dropping consistently over the past several years, and they feel like they aren't allowed to play on an equal playing field with other forms of gambling. The main idea is that they'll be able to compete more fairly if they're allowed opportunities to operate on the Internet in some capacity.

    Overall, it doesn't look like this fighting is going to get anything done. It's a classic case of cutting off your nose in spite of your face, and it's going to end with no one being able to operate on the Internet, just as it has for the past several years for similar reasons.


    Related News

    • 27 July 2015

      More Proof California Needs Online Poker

      California has been one of the major states to try to get online poker legislation passed consistently for the past few years to no avail. Every year politicians come out and say that this is the year for online poker, and every year comes and goes with no advancement of actual regulation or legislation. A new survey shows just how much people in California want online poker, and it shows that politicians should do something about it. A Massive Two-Thirds Majority

      Read full article
    • 27 May 2015

      California Continues Looking at Online Poker

      In hearings this week in the joint Senate-Assembly for the state of California, Governmental Organization committees heard expert testimony from several interesting parties that had a lot to say about the feasibility of vetting and licensing operators. They also heard from others who had other types of interest in the proposed legislation, and a strong case for online poker's expansion continued to be heard. Handling Regulated Online Poker

      Read full article
    • 27 February 2013

      Will California Be The Next State To Legalize Online Poker?

      Everyone seems to have an opinion about online poker these days. Some, as we’re hearing about in California, can even vote about it. Last Friday, Senator Lou Correa introduced Senate Bill 678, the latest effort to throw weight behind an online poker bill in California.

      Read full article