Evolution and Black Cube: Legal Battle Over Discovery Intensifies

The ongoing legal altercation involving Evolution AB, Playtech, and the private intelligence firm Black Cube has reached new levels of complexity as procedural disputes continue to dominate the court proceedings. After four years of litigation, the focus of the case has dramatically shifted from the original allegations to an intricate legal wrangle over document disclosure and adherence to discovery orders. The core issues now surround transparency, access to vital documentation, and overall litigation tactics rather than the initial claims themselves.

Key Discovery Disputes and Court Orders

The legal battle's current focus is the discovery process, which demands both parties to share relevant evidence. On September 9th, the New Jersey Superior Court mandated Black Cube to reveal documents related to its exploratory activities, which include payment details, invoices, and identification of involved personnel. Evolution alleges that Black Cube has neglected to provide necessary information concerning payments conducted post-2021 criticism, despite testimonies suggesting continuation of work linked to Evolution. Furthermore, Evolution accuses Black Cube of concealing the names of individuals associated, thereby affecting issues such as New Jersey's Uniform Public Expression Protection Act eligibility. Black Cube counters these claims, stating that Evolution agreed to the court-approved schedule and calling additional disclosures unnecessary. As it stands, the court has not yet rendered a decision on these matters.

Regulatory Documents and Further Allegations

In addition to these discovery contentions, Black Cube has charged Evolution with non-compliance regarding a December 2nd court directive to produce documents tied to inquiries by regulatory bodies like the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement and the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board. Black Cube asserts that Evolution has been withholding these records while simultaneously seeking orders to maintain confidentiality over sensitive materials, a move Black Cube argues contradicts Evolution's public engagement with regulatory findings. Evolution, however, asserts that such documents are crucially private and confidential, emphasizing a need to shield sensitive business data from potential competitive damage. Despite the continuation of demands and claims from both parties, the case’s cornerstone remains deeply entrenched in issues of regulatory scrutiny and transparency. Concerns on the adequacy of Evolution's responses to regulatory inquiries, juxtaposed with Black Cube's insistence on procedural transparency, keep the case heated and unresolved. With both regulatory and disclosure questions remaining unanswered, the intricacies of this legal feud persist as both sides await a pivotal judicial conclusion. Source: “Saga continues: Evolution faces Black Cube counterclaims over transparency”, igamingbusiness.com, December 24, 2025. By GamesAndCasino