• Legalize online gambling

    10 June 2006

    Newspaper

    Doesn’t the federal government have better things to do than outlaw Internet betting on the Super Bowl?

    Los Angeles Times / latimes.com
    Editorial
    June 9 2006

    THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES is due to vote soon on proposals to ban online gambling, and the deck seems stacked in favor of sound bites over sound policy. Federal law already outlaws businesses from using phone lines to place or receive bets across state lines, particularly when the bets are on sporting events. That restriction, although it’s not a clear ban on Internet gambling, has stopped the country’s major casinos from taking bets online. What it hasn’t done is stop Web users from gambling around the clock at offshore sites, often based in Central America and the Caribbean. According to one estimate, offshore sites offering poker games, sports betting and casino-style gambling collect $12 billion a year, about half of it coming from American wallets.

    In response, the House Judiciary Committee approved a bill last month that would explicitly ban online gambling businesses of all kinds. Even worse, to cut off the money supply for virtual gaming, the committee also backed a bill that would impose significant new regulatory burdens on financial companies, which would be barred from supporting electronic wagers or payouts. The bills are expected to be consolidated and debated on the House floor this month.

    All of which raises the question: Doesn’t the federal government have better things to do than try to block people from going online to make a wager on the Super Bowl or the Final Four?

    Supporters of the measures insist they are trying to curb the spread of gambling addiction, protect minors and crack down on unscrupulous offshore operators. They may be right about online gambling’s link to self-destructive spending, given its isolating, rat-at-the-pellet-bar quality. But the fact that the House bills wouldn’t outlaw online betting on horse racing, which Congress allowed states to authorize in 2000, seems to belie the sincerity of the effort. And isn’t it a hallmark of a free society that we don’t outlaw otherwise inoffensive vices simply because some people harm themselves?

    The complete article can be viewed at: Los Angeles Times latimes.com

    Related News

    • 31 October 2019

      Red Rake Invites Punters to Worship the Wealth God in New Slot Game Cai Shen 88

      Casino supplier and game developer, Red Rake Gaming, is releasing a new slot experience inspired by and dedicated to the Taoist deity Cai Shen, the god of wealth and luxury. The game called Cain Shen 88 and comes with five reels and three rows and 25 fixed paylines. When it comes to design, it’s all about Far Eastern elegance with golden symbols that represent wealth and prosperity.

      Read full article
    • 18 October 2019

      Genesis Global Limited to Launch Kassu Online Casino with PayNPlay Focus

      The online casino space is growing globally at an exponential rate, and competition is fierce and merciless. Still, that doesn’t dissuade many companies from trying and one such company is Genesis Global Limited who has just announced the launch of a new online venue called Kassu Casino. Licensed in Malta and in the United Kingdom, and will be launched very soon. The newly revealed online venue has a trick up its sleeve and a definitive selling point that sets it apart.

      Read full article
    • 08 October 2019

      WinADay Casino Celebrates $188K Jackpot Hit with Special Bonus

      Another day, another jackpot hit at one of the world’s many online casinos. With so many available, it’s no wonder every now and then we hear news of yet another punter getting very lucky and walking away with a significant amount of cash. This is exactly what happened to one Kelly S, who walked away with a pretty sweet $188,000 dollars after taking a spin at the WinADay online casino.

      Read full article