• South Carolina Wrestles with Skill vs Chance

    24 October 2010


    The South Carolina courts are now tasked with another gambling decision: is poker a game of skill or a game of chance? A statute written in 1802 declares all forms of gaming illegal (that is, all games with cards and/or dice), regardless if real money is at stake. Rather than stick with the literal interpretation of the law, the current administration weighs a game’s reliance on chance versus skill. In essence, the more skill-based, the more legal it becomes.

    Rather than rely on a sliding scale of innocence, South Carolina has historically stated that all gaming is illegal. Only until recently has it started to change its tune, especially given the case where 25 people, several thousands of dollars in cash, a weee bit of marijuana, and the set-up of a poker tournament were discovered during a police raid in 2006. Initially found guilty by a local judge, the decision was later reversed by a circuit court judge who based his decision on the fact that the men were playing Texas Hold’Em, a game the judge considered to be a game of skill.

    The case has escalated to the South Caroline Supreme Court as the Attorney General is again appealing the decision, arguing that the guilt lies not in whether or not Texas Hold’Em is a game of skill, but in the fact that the men created a “House of Gaming” when they announced the poker tournament online, charged a cover fee, and had more than 25 participants gather in one place.

    We’ll keep coming back to the skill versus chance argument time and time again as courts around the nation and, arguably, above it, battle out how to make online gambling work (or not work) in the framework of our governing bodies. While South Carolina determines its stance, the rest of the  country waits for the bigger verdict: whether or not to allow an online “House of Gaming” to promote a game of skill across state, country, and international borders.

    Related News

    • 24 August 2017

      What is the Internet Gambling Amendment Bill?

      All legal online casino gambling and real money poker play will soon become a thing of the past for Australians. On August 9 the Senate passed The Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016. The writing had been on the wall since the bill was introduced on the floor of the House of Representatives of the Australian Federal Parliament on November 10, 2016. The bill amended the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA).  Where did the IGA Amendment Bill Come From?

      Read full article
    • 24 August 2017

      PokerStars ends advertising relationships in Australia

      PokerStars Partners, the marketing arm of The Stars Group (formerly Amaya) responsible for promoting the popular brand, announced to advertising affiliates on Tuesday that all promotion of the PokerStars brand in Australia must cease immediately. Government Bans Online Casinos and Poker Sites August 9 the Australian Senate passed the Internet Gambling Amendment Bill 2016 after the bill had passed the house in similar form in June.

      Read full article
    • 21 March 2017

      Full Flush Poker Domain Purchased With New Warning

      Full Flush Poker is a dead online poker room that was initially launched as the main room of the Equity Poker Network, an emerging online poker network that was supposed to be a non-profit type of venture. Previously, the poker room and the network both shut down around the same time, and an estimated total of over $2 million was left owed to players, affiliates and others associated with the venture in various ways.

      Read full article